
Blog
Boost Benefits Compliance (and Your HR Cred!)
Supreme Court to Rule on Preventative Services Mandate
- GINA
- Coronavirus
- Cafeteria Plans
- Affordable Care Act
- MEWA
- Healthcare Reform
- health care reform
- Regulations
- ACA Reporting
- Preventive Care
- fiduciary
- plans
- consolidated appropriations act
- SBC
- retirement
- Penalties
- benefits
- Medicare
- Form 5500
- OCR
- Supreme Court
- same-sex spouses
- EBSA
- CARES Act
- Pay or Play
- HRA
- mental health parity
- Group Health Plans
- Shared Responsibility
- COBRA
- FSA
- HSA
- CAA
- CMS
- HHS
- SECURE 2.0
- SECURE Act
- COVID-19
- erisa
- HIPAA
- DOL
- 401(k)
- IRS
- ACA
- Health & Welfare
The information and content contained in this blog are for general informational purposes only, and does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. As always, for specific questions concerning your health or 401(k) plans, please consult your own ERISA attorney or professional advisor.
Reminder! COVID-19’s Altered Benefit Plan Deadlines
The FFCRA and CARES Act legislation extended certain guidelines applicable to plan administration actions (e.g., claims and appeals deadlines). What does this mean for employers? Plans covered by ERISA or the IRS Code must alter administrative management of plans to
IRS Updates 401(k) Model Rollover Notice
On August 6, 2020, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Notice 2020-62 which updates the information that must be provided to participants in retirement plans (including 401(k) plans) when they become eligible for a distribution (this is often referred to
DOL Keeps Its “Social Distance” from 401(k) Plan Investments in Environmental, Social and Governance Funds
On June 30, 2020, the U. S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) published a proposed rule (see also related Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) that would throw cold water on the idea of “social investing” in retirement plans, including 401(k) plans. In
DOL Proposes Revised Prohibited Transaction Exemption
On June 29, 2020, the U. S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued a proposed prohibited transaction exemption (“PTE”) - along with a related fact sheet - that would permit “investment advice fiduciaries” to receive compensation in exchange for providing investment